Why doesn’t the auto-close work sooner as I leave home? I have it set for 250 feet, but sometimes it doesn’t close the door until I’m much further away.

Follow

Comments

10 comments

  • Vincent

    Considering all of the technical reasons as to what would cause a vehicle to be /further/ than the minimum configurable 250 feet for auto close, then it seems like 250 feet might actually be too far and you really should consider allowing an auto close closer than 250 feet. If the purpose of this is security, just being out of site after forgetting to close your garage is in itself a security issue - if someone watches you drive out of site with your garage open this provides ample time for them to run into your garage without anyone knowing.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Scott Riesebosch

    Hi Vincent,

    Correct. But there is a large technical reason to NOT close it sooner. Phones have GPS errors. The phone operating system might send our app a location update with a confidence level of 30 feet when in fact it is actually off by 100 feet. If we were to allow small distances for auto-close it will cause doors to close unexpectedly.

    As we always state in all of our literature - this is an "in case you forget" feature. If you leave and forget to close your garage door, the auto-close will detect it and close the door for you.

    That said, we do recognize that our customers would really like to have the door close while they can still see it close and we are working on this.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Cephraim4

    Any updates on this, Scott?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Scott Riesebosch

    Hi Craig,

    Nothing I can disclose publicly Craig. There is some intellectual property involved.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Mark

    Hey, just checking back in on this.  What I would ask is if you would trust us end users to set a closer close distance.  I understand GPS inaccuracy and the possibility that the door could close when you didn't intend it to, but let us play with the "right" distance for our particular setup.

    Maybe you could require acceptance of a warning and liability if we want to set the distance to less than 250ft recommended by Tailwind.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Cephraim4

    I have been asking for that for years and Scott has indicated that they are working on it.  Glad to hear others are interested.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Mark

    Yes, we are relatively new to Tailwind, but are very happy with the solution other than this challenge.  I think if they refined this feature as a true auto-close feature instead of a "just in case you forgot" feature they would find a huge market with Tesla owners as Tesla no longer offers the option for Homelink and their replacement MyQ solution is unreliable and expensive.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Cephraim4

    Agreed.  And, I drive a Model Y.  LOL

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Mark

    I have a '21 MYP with Homelink.  We got a '23 MYLR for my wife in December and were very disappointed to find out that we could no longer order the Homelink module.  We tried the MyQ solution and found it to be very unreliable, so we went searching for something better.  Tailwind is certainly it!  We have an older Durango that shares the same door with my wife's Tesla and bought one of the pucks so it can open and close the door too.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Scott Riesebosch

    We are working on a solution for this, but we cannot just allow users to set a shorter distance and accept the responsibility / risk. We already tried that and here is what happened:

    When a user tried to set a shorter distance for auto-close, the app popped up a substantial disclaimer with bold red text that stated something like "Setting distances shorter than 250 feet can result in unexpected door closing due to location errors. This can result in the door closing while you are still in your garage or while you are exiting your garage."

    You can guess what happened. EVERYBODY was setting the shortest possible distance, clicked to accept the risk, and then unfortunately some of them had the door close on their car when the GPS was off by 30 feet. And you can further guess that they posted about it in forums and how terrible we were and that we should pay for the damages, and they would tell all their friends to stay away from such a dangerous product.

    When I brought it to their attention that they were made aware of the risk and sent the screenshot it did not help matters.

    So while I'm a HUGE fan of allowing users to configure as many things as possible, this is not one of them - at least not in the current solution. The risk is just way, way, way too high.

    There is something coming from us on this but it is not a trivial solution. It is actually quite complicated given so many different scenarios need to be considered, and we do NOT want to close the door too soon. The reason Teslas can close it sooner is because the vehicle computer is involved. It knows wheel speed, heading, and much more - way more data beyond just location data. With all of that additional data and the fact that they are not constrained by power limitations imposed by a phone OS,  they can conclude much sooner that you are leaving and send the command to close the door.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.